pdf-version article

Fedorova E. “The Principle of Dominance in the Characters of the Novel “Demons” by F. M. Dostoevsky (in Light of the Ethical Teachings of A. A. Ukhtomsky)”, The problems of historical poetics. 2023, Tom №21, Issue №1. DOI: 10.15393/j9.art.2023.11962

References

1. Al’tman M. S. Dostoevskiy. Po vekham imen [Dostoevsky. By Milestone Names]. Saratov, Saratov State University Publ., 1975. 278 p. (In Russ.)

2. Ashimbaeva N. T. Double or “Deserved Interlocutor”: Some Questions of Dostoevsky’s Poetics in the Light of Views on a Person and His Relationship with the Outside World. In: Dostoevskiy i mirovaya kul’tura [Dostoevsky and World Culture]. St. Petersburg, Serebryanyy vek Publ., 1999, issue 13, pp. 123–131. (In Russ.)

3. Bem A. L. Faust in Dostoevsky’s Works. In: O Dostoevskom: sbornik statey [About Dostoevsky: Collection of Articles]. Paris, Amga Editions Publ., 1986, pp. 229–255. (In Russ.)

4. Budanova N. F. On Some Sources of the Moral and Philosophical Problems of the Novel “The Demons”. In: Dostoevskiy. Materialy i issledovaniya [Dostoevsky. Materials and Researches]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1988, vol. 8, pp. 93–106. (In Russ.)

5. Grossman L. P. The Stylistics by Stavrogin. On the Study of a New Chapter of “The Demons”. In: F. M. Dostoevskiy: stat’i i materialy [F. M. Dostoevsky: Articles and Materials]. Petersburg, Mysl’ Publ., 1924, collection 2, pp. 139– 148. (In Russ.)

6. Darenskiy V. Yu. A. A. Ukhtomsky’s Philosophy as Existential Hermeneutics. In: Filosofskiy polilog: zhurnal Mezhdunarodnogo tsentra izucheniya russkoy filosofii [Philosophical Polylogue: Journal of the International Center for the Study of Russian Philosophy], 2019, no. 2 (6), pp. 46–58. Available at: http://polylogue.jourssa.ru/index.php/polylogue/article/view/94 (accessed on December 10, 2022). DOI: https://10.31119/phlog.2019.6.4 (In Russ.)

7. Zakharov V. N. “The Demons”: Experience of the Reconstruction of the Journal Edition. In: Dostoevskiy F. M. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy: kanonicheskie teksty [Dostoevsky F. M. The Complete Works: Canonical Texts]. Petrozavodsk, Petrozavodsk State University Publ., 2010, vol. 9, pp. 673–706. (In Russ.)

8. Ivanov Vyach. The Main Myth of the Novel “The Demons”. In: Ivanov Vyach. Sobranie sochineniy: v 4 tomakh [Ivanov Vyach. Collected Works: in 4 Vols]. Brussels, Foyer oriental chrétien Publ., 1987, vol. 4, pp. 437–444. (In Russ.)

9. Kazakova N. Yu. Dictatorship of Soul: Dostoevsky’s “The Demons” in the Criticism of the Silver Age. In: Rossiya i sovremennyy mir [Russia and the Contemporary World], 2020, no. 2 (107), pp. 276–284. DOI: 10.31249/rsm/2020.02.16 (In Russ.)

10. Ped’ko M. V. Nasledie Gete v tvorchestve F. M. Dostoevskogo: struktura i dinamika personazha: avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk [The Legacy of Goethe in the Works of F. M. Dostoevsky: the Structure and Dynamics of the Character. PhD. philol. sci. diss. abstract]. St. Petersburg, 2006. 20 p. (In Russ.)

11. Pletnev R. Earth (from “Nature in the Works of Dostoevsky”). In: O Dostoevskom: sbornik statey [About Dostoevsky: Collection of Articles]. Paris, Amga Editions Publ., 1986, pp. 175–184. (In Russ.) (a)

12. Pletnev R. “Wise in Heart” (About the “Elders” in Dostoevsky’s Novels). In: O Dostoevskom: sbornik statey [About Dostoevsky: Collection of Articles]. Paris, Amga Editions Publ., 1986, pp. 155–174. (In Russ.) (b)

13. Prokof’ev N. I. Vision as a Genre in Ancient Russian Literature. In: Uchenye zapiski Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo instituta imeni Lenina. Voprosy stilya khudozhestvennoy literatury [Scientific Notes of the Moscow State Pedagogical Institute Named After V. I. Lenin. Questions of the Style of Fiction]. Мoscow, 1964, no. 231, pp. 35–56. (In Russ.)

14. Saraskina L. I. “Besy”: roman-preduprezhdenie [“The Demons”: a Warning Novel]. Moscow, Sovetskiy pisatel’ Publ., 1990. 480 p. (In Russ.) 15. Serman I. Z. Dostoevsky and Goethe. In: Dostoevskiy. Materialy i issledovaniya [Dostoevsky. Materials and Researches]. St. Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 1997, vol. 14, pp. 46–58. (In Russ.)

16. Solov’ev S. M. Izobrazitel’nye sredstva v tvorchestve F. M. Dostoevskogo [Visual Means in the Works of F. M. Dostoevsky]. Moscow, Sovetskiy pisatel’ Publ., 1979. 352 p. (In Russ.)

17. Tarasenko T. Yu. The Creative History of the Novel by F. M. Dostoevsky “The Demons”: “a Missed Chapter” “At Tikhon”. In: Ural’skiy filologicheskiy vestnik. Seriya: Russkaya klassika: dinamika khudozhestvennykh sistem [Ural Philological Bulletin. Series: Russian Classic: the Dynamics of Artistic Systems]. Ekaterinburg, 2012, no. 6, pp. 42–49. (In Russ.)

18. Tarasova N. A. “Dnevnik pisatelya” F. M. Dostoevskogo (1876–1877). Kritika teksta [“A Writer’s Diary” by F. M. Dostoevsky (1876–1877). Textual Criticism]. Moscow, Kvadriga Publ., MBA Publ., 2011. 392 p. (In Russ.)

19. Tarasova N. A. Kibal’nik S. A., Dimitriev V. M. Problemy tekstologii i poetiki romannogo tvorchestva F. M. Dostoevskogo [Problems of Textual Criticism and Poetics of the Novel Creativity of F. M. Dostoevsky]. Moscow, Kvadriga Publ., 2021. 276 p. (In Russ.)

20. Ukhtomskiy A. A. Dominanta [Dominant]. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2020. 512 p. (In Russ.)

21. Fedorova E. A. The Dominant Soul and Chronotop Raskolnikov: from the “Double” to the “Interlocutor” (by A. Ukhtomsky). In: Sotsial’nye i gumanitarnye znaniya [Social and Humanitarian Knowledge], 2016, vol. 2, no. 4 (8), pp. 327–332. Available at: http://j.uniyar.ac.ru/index.php/dnk/article/view/101 (accessed on December 10, 2022). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18255/2412- 6519-2016-4-327-332 (In Russ.)

22. Fedorova E. A. The Author and the Hero in the Poetics of F. M. Dostoevsky’s Novel “The Idiot”. In: Problemy istoricheskoy poetiki [The Problems of Historical Poetics], 2019, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 186–206. Available at: https://poetica.pro/ files/redaktor_pdf/1568037576.pdf (accessed on December 10, 2022). DOI: 10.15393/j9.art.2019.7022 (In Russ.)

23. Khalizev V. E. Intuition of Conscience (Aleksey Ukhtomsky’s Concept of Dominant in the Context of 20th Century Philosophy and Cultural Studies). In: Problemy istoricheskoy poetiki [The Problems of Historical Poetics]. Petrozavodsk, Petrozavodsk State University Publ., 2001, issue 6, pp. 21–42. Available at: https://poetica.pro/journal/article.php?id=2512 (accessed on December 10, 2022). DOI: 10.15393/j9.art.2001.2512 (In Russ.)

24.Chudakov A. P. The Object World of Dostoevsky. In: Dostoevskiy. Materialy i issledovaniya [Dostoevsky. Materials and Researches]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1980, issue 4, pp. 96–105. (In Russ.)

25. Doblin A. Goethe und Dostojewski [Goethe and Dostoevsky]. In: Doblin A. Aufsätze zur Literatur [Doblin A. Essays on Literature]. Olten, Walter-Verlag Publ., 1963, pp. 312–321. (In German)

26. Kostovski I. Dostoevsky and Goethe: Two Devils, Two Geniuses. A Study of the Demonic in Their Work. New York, Revisionist Press Publ., 1974. 131 p. (In English)

27. Masaryk T. G. Studie o F. M. Dostojevském (s rukopisnými poznámkami) [Studies on F. M. Dostoevsky (with Manuscript Notes)]. Prague, Slovanský ústav a Společnost Dostojevského Publ., 1932. 84 p. (In Czech)

28. Potapova G. Dostoevskij als Leser Goethes [Dostoevsky as a Reader of Goethe]. In: 12th Symposium of the International Dostoevsky Society. Geneva, 2004, September 1–6, p. 312. (In German)