pdf-version article

Kibalnik S. “Spiritual and Aesthetic Unity and Diversity of Russian Literary Classics of the 19th Century”, The problems of historical poetics. 2026, Tom №24, Issue №3. DOI: 10.15393/j9.art.2026.17923

References

1. A. P. Chekhov: pro et contra: tvorchestvo A. P. Chekhova v russkoy mysli kontsa XIX — nachala XX veka (1887–1914): antologiya [A. P. Chekhov: Pro et Contra: The Works of A. P. Chekhov in Russian Thought of the Late 19th — Early 20th Century (1887–1914): An Anthology]. St. Petersburg, Russian Christian Humanitarian Institute Publ., 2002. 1072 p. (Ser.: The Russian Way.) (In Russ.)
2. Bem A. L. Artistic Polemic with Tolstoy (Toward an Understanding of “The Adolescent”). In: Vokrug Dostoevskogo: v 2 tomakh [Around Dostoevsky: in 2 Vols]. Moscow, Russkiy put’ Publ., 2007, vol. 1: About Dostoevsky: Collection of Articles Edited by A. L. Bem: Praga: 1929/1933/1936, pp. 535–551. (In Russ.)
3. Grigoriev D. The Gospel and Raskolnikov. In: Problemy istoricheskoy poetiki [The Problems of Historical Poetics]. Petrozavodsk, Petrozavodsk State University Publ., 2005, vo1. 7, pp. 296–301. Available at: https://poetica.pro/journal/article.php?id=2669 (accessed on June 16, 2026). EDN: RUYLQB (In Russ.)
4. Dostoevskiy F. M. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy: v 30 tomakh [The Complete Works: in 30 Vols]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., vol. 15: The Brothers Karamazov. Books 11–12. Epilogue: Manuscript Versions. 624 p. (In Russ.)
5. Dostoevskiy F. M. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy i pisem: v 35 tomakh [The Complete Works and Letters: in 35 Vols]. 2nd ed., revised and supplemented. St. Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 2016, vol. 6: Crime and Punishment. 480 p. (In Russ.)
6. Zhivolupova N. V. Dostoevskiy i Chekhov: aspekty arkhitektoniki i poetiki: sbornik statey [Dostoevsky and Chekhov: Aspects of Architectonics and Poetics: Collection of Articles]. Nizhny Novgorod, Dyatlovy gory Publ., 2017. 268 p. (Ser.: The International Dostoevsky Society.) (In Russ.)
7. Zakharov V. N. The Polemics as a Dіalogue: Dostoevsky in a Сontroversy with Tolstoy. In: Problemy istoricheskoy poetiki [The Problems of Historical Poetics]. Petrozavodsk, Petrozavodsk State University Publ., 2013, vol. 11, pp. 242–255. Available at: https://poetica.pro/files/redaktor_pdf/1431516700.pdf (accessed on June 16, 2026). EDN: KRDSID (In Russ.)
8. Zakharov V. N. The Concept of the Novel as a Creative Dialogue Between Tolstoy and Dostoevsky: “War and Peace” and “Crime and Punishment”. In: Problemy istoricheskoy poetiki [The Problems of Historical Poetics], 2025, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 159–176. Available at: https://poetica.pro/files/redaktor_pdf/1749664041.pdf (accessed on June 16, 2026). DOI: 10.15393/j9.art.2025.15202. EDN: TBLEDG (In Russ.)
9. Kataev V. B. Proza Chekhova: problemy interpretatsii [Chekhov’s Prose: Problems of Interpretation]. Moscow, Lomonosov Moscow State University Publ., 1979. 327 p. (In Russ.)
10. Kibal’nik S. A. A Metaphor of Freedom or an Allegory of Suicide? “America” in Dostoevsky’s Works. In: Literatura dvukh Amerik [Literature of the Americas], 2021, no. 11, pp. 8–33. Available at: https://www.litda.ru/images/2021-11/LDA-2021-11_8-33_Kibalnik.pdf (accessed on June 16, 2026). DOI: 10.22455/2541-7894-2021-11-8-33. EDN: TWMMJU (In Russ.)
11. Kibal’nik S. A. Anna Karenina’s Hypertexts in Chekhov’s Works. In: Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Literaturovedenie. Zhurnalistika [RUDN Journal of Studies in Literature and Journalism], 2023, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 437–450. Available at: https://journals.rudn.ru/literary-criticism/article/view/36785/22759 (accessed on June 16, 2026). DOI: 10.22363/2312-9220-2023-28-3-437-450. EDN: SAOAJQ (In Russ.)
12. Kibal’nik S. A. The Idea of “Restoration of a Ruined Person” in Classic Russian Literature (Dostoevsky, Tolstoy, Chekhov). In: Problemy istoricheskoy poetiki [The Problems of Historical Poetics], 2024, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 157–175. Available at: https://poetica.pro/files/redaktor_pdf/1708001936.pdf (accessed on June 16, 2026). DOI: 10.15393/j9.art.2024.12882. EDN: XSBXCW (In Russ.) (a)
13. Kibal’nik S. A. Chekhov’s “Three Sisters” and Its Dostoevsky’s Pretext. In: Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Philologiya [Tomsk State University Journal of Philology], 2024, no. 87, pp. 221–232. Available at: https://vital.lib.tsu.ru/vital/access/services/Download/koha:001134264/SOURCE1?view=true (accessed on June 16, 2026). DOI: 10.17223/19986645/87/12. EDN: SENXKU (In Russ.) (b)
14. Kibal’nik S. A. Chekhov and the Bakhtin Tradition of Interpreting His Works. In: Filologicheskie nauki. Nauchnye doklady vysshey shkoly [Philological Sciences. Scientific Essays of Higher Education], 2024, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 51–64. DOI: 10.20339/PhS.2.2-24.051. EDN: QVGSKH (In Russ.) (c)
15. Kibal’nik S. A. Prince Myshkin Rewritten by Tolstoy, Chekhov, and Pasternak. In: Problemy istoricheskoy poetiki [The Problems of Historical Poetics], 2025, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 177–200. Available at: https://poetica.pro/files/redaktor_pdf/1749664061.pdf (accessed on June 16, 2026). DOI: 10.15393/j9.art.2025.15044. EDN: PXQWZM (In Russ.)
16. Merezhkovskiy D. S. L. Tolstoy i Dostoevskiy: vechnye sputniki: ocherki [L. Tolstoy and Dostoevsky: Eternal Companions: Essays]. Moscow, Respublika Publ., 1995. 624 p. (Ser.: Past and Present.) (In Russ.)
17. Nabokov V. V. Lektsii po russkoy literature [Lectures on Russian Literature]. Moscow, AST Publ., Corpus Publ., 2025. 544 p. (Ser.: The Nabokov Corpus.) (In Russ.)
18. F. M. Dostoevskiy, A. G. Dostoevskaya. Perepiska [F. M. Dostoevsky, A. G. Dostoevskaya. Correspondence]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1976. 490 p. (Ser.: Literary Monuments.) (In Russ.)
19. Fokin S. L. “The Tolstoevsky Enigma”, or Should We Finally Come up with a Straitjacket for Inventors of Theoretical Fiction? (Review of Pierre Bayard’s Book L’Enigme Tolstoievski, Minuit, 2017). In: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2019, no. 3, pp. 333–338. EDN: KMGKEC (In Russ.)
20. Chekhov A. P. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy i pisem: v 30 tomakh. Sochineniya: v 18 tomakh. Pis’ma: v 12 tomakh [The Complete Works and Letters: in 30 Vols. Works: in 18 Vols. Letters: in 12 Vols]. Мoscow, Nauka Publ., 1974–1983. (In Russ.)